>> http://bsdanywhere.org/node/35
> Since nobody else has said anything -- I'm interested. I'm pretty much
> interested in all things BSD-Unixy. Please don't take the quiet in
> response to your post to indicate a lack of interest.
I down loaded and put on CD-R's the AMD 64 and the i386 versions.
The AMP 64 version wouldn't run because a line in /something/boot
was too long. (I have a 1.8 Gig AMD 64 CPU.)
The i386 version ran fine, but it lacked everything. No mc, free didn't work
dir didn't work, df did work
The X system menu had a terminal program and not much else other than a whole
list of screen managers to chose from all beginning with XF---
Ping worked and it set up DHCP OK, firefox worked fine but it wasn't on the menu.
I may have missed a menu, but I sure looked, I found it useless for everyday use.
Could the current BSD be like a worm in a horseradish, with all of that sweet
food all around? (this was like living in a cave comparing it to Ver.3.5 of
Slackware)
--
Ron KA4INM - Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog.
Tomorrow I'll probably still be a dog. Sigh!
There's so little hope for advancement. -- Snoopy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:25:52 EDT