Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence

• Next message: khepri: "Re: [flalug] Novells CTO Blog"
• Previous message: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
• In reply to: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:08:33PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 05:01 pm, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:27:46PM -0400, tom smith wrote:
> > > http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=B622162D-78B4-4B9B-BFA6-24
> > >92FAF60656
> >
> > That's actually a pretty fun read. It's hilarious to see the way IBM is
> > using language similar to what I'd use when trying to remain civil while
> > dealing with a complete troll on a public message board.
>
> You've never met a complete troll on a public message board, have you?

Er, yes, I have.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
unix virus: If you're using a unixlike OS, please forward
this to 20 others and erase your system partition.

• Next message: khepri: "Re: [flalug] Novells CTO Blog"
• Previous message: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
• In reply to: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:58:57 EDT