Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell.

From: Christopher Pace (cpace@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jan 05 2006 - 20:30:01 EST

Next message: tom smith: "[flalug] DVD is dead, but what's coming next?"
Previous message: tom smith: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
In reply to: tom smith: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

SCO?!?!?

No WAY!

Next thing they'll be doing is calling Micro$oft a Bully <gasp>!!!

Pace

----- Original Message ----
From: tom smith <atomsmitty@gmail.com>
To: flalug@nks.net
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 2:22:29 PM
Subject: Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell.

It does, but sco is using dilatory tactics. Just being a
nuisance.
Smitty

William Coulter wrote:
> I read this from slashdot. Now they are saying that Novell is infrenging on there copyrights.
> But I thought that Novell owns the copyrights on UNIX.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060103205225103
>
> William
>
>

Next message: tom smith: "[flalug] DVD is dead, but what's coming next?"
Previous message: tom smith: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
In reply to: tom smith: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:23:55 EDT