Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell.

From: tom smith (atomsmitty@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 05 2006 - 14:22:29 EST

Next message: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Previous message: William Coulter: "[flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
In reply to: William Coulter: "[flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Next in thread: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Reply: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

It does, but sco is using dilatory tactics. Just being a
nuisance.
Smitty

William Coulter wrote:
> I read this from slashdot. Now they are saying that Novell is infrenging on there copyrights.
> But I thought that Novell owns the copyrights on UNIX.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060103205225103
>
> William
>
>

Next message: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Previous message: William Coulter: "[flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
In reply to: William Coulter: "[flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Next in thread: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Reply: Christopher Pace: "Re: [flalug] SCO adds a second amendment to Novell."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:23:52 EDT