Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:13:16PM -0400, smitty wrote:
>
>>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050809082902461
>
>
> I knew SCO was being scummy about all that lawsuit nonsense, but I had
> no idea about the depths to which they'd sunk. This is beyond what I
> expected of SCO. Utterly beyond belief. How could SCO executives have
> had any notion they'd get away with anything?
>
> --
> Chad Perrin
> [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
I've seen this tactic used before in other arenas....
Go on the offensive, attack your potential attacker first in an attaempt
to discredit them up front, when they counter they do so from a position
not as strong as they would have had otherwise....
I have to agree though, this is the worst example of a deployment of
that strategy I've ever seen!...LOL
It should go in a file "How NOT to do this"...
I'm not sure I have the story completely straight, but it would seem
that IBM is going to have plenty to say yet if the above is true...
Alothough I don't see howit could get any worse at this point!
Good luck in CO
Chris in SP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:10:19 EDT