Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence

From: Chad Perrin (perrin@apotheon.com)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2006 - 17:01:10 EDT

Next message: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Previous message: tom smith: "[flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
In reply to: tom smith: "[flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Next in thread: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Reply: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:27:46PM -0400, tom smith wrote:
> http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=B622162D-78B4-4B9B-BFA6-2492FAF60656

That's actually a pretty fun read. It's hilarious to see the way IBM is
using language similar to what I'd use when trying to remain civil while
dealing with a complete troll on a public message board.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
"Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to
build programs out of the wrong concepts." - Paul Graham

Next message: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Previous message: tom smith: "[flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
In reply to: tom smith: "[flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Next in thread: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Reply: Steve Litt: "Re: [flalug] IBM says SCO willfully failed to detail evidence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:58:40 EDT