Re: [flalug] Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay Costs

From: Chad Perrin (perrin@apotheon.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 21:04:47 EST

Next message: tom smith: "[flalug] 60% Of Windows Vista Code To Be Rewritten"
Previous message: tom smith: "[flalug] Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay Costs"
In reply to: tom smith: "[flalug] Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay Costs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 08:36:34PM -0500, tom smith wrote:
> Some on this list may remember when this frivolous suit was
> initiated a couple years ago.
> Smitty
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060320201540127

Hallelujah. I had little doubt this would be how it ended, but it's
still satisfying to see it in print.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
This sig for rent:  a Signify v1.14 production from http://www.debian.org/

Next message: tom smith: "[flalug] 60% Of Windows Vista Code To Be Rewritten"
Previous message: tom smith: "[flalug] Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay Costs"
In reply to: tom smith: "[flalug] Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay Costs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:39:26 EDT