On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:44:26PM -0500, tom smith wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Frankly, I prefer the GIMP interface, and the functionality is
> > equivalent for anything short of ILM, so I'm happy with what I've got.
> > I'm also happy with the greatly reduced resource footprint of the GIMP
> > as compared with Photoshop.
> >
>
> I also have no problem with the GIMP interface. However, I
> see no reason for lack of support for jpeg2000, which could
> be implemented with only a small amount of coding.
I don't disagree with that.
-- Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ] unix virus: If you're using a unixlike OS, please forward this to 20 others and erase your system partition.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:28:21 EDT