I thought the 172.16.255.0 looked wierd personally. Looks like it's out of the mix now, and it works.
Randall Johnson II
>
> From: Eben King <eben1@tampabay.rr.com>
> Date: 2004/06/26 Sat PM 12:19:18 EDT
> To: flalug@nks.net
> Subject: Re: [flalug] odd behavior with new router
>
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 03:01:45 -0400, Darrin Jones <darrin@ravenrock.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Do I detect VMWare? (vmnet8)
>
> Yeah, it works.
>
> > Is it possibly the virtual network bridge? I had that installed for
> > about a
> > day before I yanked it back out because it completly hosed my networking.
>
> I did "service vmware stop", and brought eth0 down/up, and that didn't
> work (unless VMware messes it up so badly that I have to take more drastic
> measures to restore it). After that, my routing table looks like this:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.31 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
> --
> -eben ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar
> PISCES: Try to avoid any Virgos or Leos with the Ebola virus.
> You are the Lord of the Dance, no matter what those idiots at
> work say. -- Weird Al, _Your Horoscope for Today_
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:06:37 EDT