Da bomb! Don't know how you found that one, but SWEET! I'll use that to
come up with something usefull. Now I'll also re-examine what other
measurements didn't add up when comparing to status (ie top/ps results). I
notice one of the comments made on that document mentioned "VmExe, Virtual
memory usage by executable and statically linked libraries 'man top' says
this is broken ? ". Perhaps this has something to do with it.
Anyway,
Thanks Bill.
PS If I ever need any investigative work done, I'll be looking you up! I
really did spend a long time looking for this information.
-----Original Message-----
From: flalug@nks.net [mailto:flalug@nks.net]On Behalf Of Bill Triplett
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 6:39 AM
To: flalug@nks.net
Subject: Re: [flalug] more memory questions...
On Mar 14, 2004, at 5:43 AM, Larry Brown wrote:
> Just wanted to thank everyone for the input, especially Eben. I found
> the
> problem in a directive that was misunderstood in the httpd.conf file.
> It
> was allowing a child to remain in memory for extended periods of time
> and I
> believe I have fixed the problem. I still wish I had a better
> understanding
> of exactly what each of these memory figures correlates to and
> consequently
> why some of the other memory numbers don't add up.
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/footprint/footprint-guide.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:16:13 EDT